Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 NOVEMBER 2013

A Class Action By Any Other Name Is Still A Class Action….

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

In a case with interesting implications for class action practitioners, the Seventh Circuit recently ruled against plaintiff Addison Automatics (Addison) in its attempt to dodge federal court jurisdiction (see Addison Automatics, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co., case no. 13-2729).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a case with interesting implications for class action practitioners, the Seventh Circuit recently ruled against plaintiff Addison Automatics (Addison) in its attempt to dodge federal court jurisdiction (see Addison Automatics, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. case no. 13-2729.

Addison had previously brought and settled a class action against Domino Plastics Co. (Domino) over Domino's practice of sending junk faxes in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) (for more on TCPA issues, see Call Me, Maybe? A Nationwide Survey of Insurance Coverage for TCPA Class Actions and New Jersey Judge Certifies TCPA Junk Fax Class).  Domino's insurer, Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. (Hartford), refused to provide coverage, and in order to protect its own interests, Domino settled the case with Addison for $18 million.  However, as part of that settlement, Addison agreed that none of that amount would be collected from Domino – rather, Domino assigned

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from