Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2026

Tariff Alert: CIT Invalidates Global Section 122 Tariffs In Major Decision

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

On May 7, 2026, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a significant decision in State of Oregon et al. v. United States and Burlap and Barrel, Inc. et al. v. United States, invalidating the Administration’s February 2026 “emergency” 10% tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Clients that have paid Section 122 tariffs should evaluate their options for pursuing a refund of such sums promptly.

United StatesInternational Law

Overview

On May 7, 2026, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a significant decision in State of Oregon et al. v. United States and Burlap and Barrel, Inc. et al. v. United States, invalidating the Administration’s February 2026 “emergency” 10% tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Clients that have paid Section 122 tariffs should evaluate their options for pursuing a refund of such sums promptly.

The court concluded that the President lacked statutory authority to impose the tariffs because the conditions required by Section 122 were not properly satisfied. It therefore granted summary judgment to certain plaintiffs and enjoined enforcement of the tariffs against them.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from