Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JULY 2018

ZEROing In On Genericness: Federal Circuit Vacates Decision Finding ZERO Registrable

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Federal Circuit vacated the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's determination that "ZERO" is not generic and has acquired distinctiveness, and remanded.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In Short

The Decision: The Federal Circuit vacated the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's determination that "ZERO" is not generic and has acquired distinctiveness, and remanded.

The Reasoning: The Board erroneously framed the standard for genericness and failed to evaluate the degree of descriptiveness of "ZERO" when assessing acquired distinctiveness.

The Implications: Marks can be refused registration on the basis of genericness if they are considered generic for a subset of the goods on which they are used. Additionally, the Trademark Office applies a sliding scale in determining the amount of evidence necessary to establish acquired distinctiveness based on the mark's descriptiveness.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from