Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JANUARY 2016

Will The Patent Venue Statute Be Reinterpreted?

Heartland, is an Indiana limited liability company that is not registered to do business in Delaware and does not have any regular or established place of business in Delaware.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Heartland, is an Indiana limited liability company that is not registered to do business in Delaware and does not have any regular or established place of business in Delaware. It was sued for patent infringement in the District of Delaware and its motion to dismiss or transfer the action under 28 U.S.C. §1406 was denied. In the pending Federal Circuit mandamus action it filed,  In re TC Heartland, Heartland has asked the court to reconsider its interpretation of the patent venue statute 28 U.S.C. §1400(b).

For a court to adjudicate a case, it has to have jurisdiction, both personal jurisdiction over the defendant and subject matter jurisdiction. But the place, or venue, where the case will be adjudicated depends upon where venue is proper. The patent venue statute,  28 U.S.C. §1400(b), provides that a civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from