Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MAY 2020

When Possessing A Trade Secret Is Enough To Sue

In trade secret litigation, particularly among government contractors, defenses are sometimes asserted based on whether the plaintiff actually owns or...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Third Circuit Upholds Trade Secret Protection for NASA Supplier Even Though Supplier Did Not Own the Trade Secret

In trade secret litigation, particularly among government contractors, defenses are sometimes asserted based on whether the plaintiff actually owns or retains a sufficient interest in the trade secret at issue. This can arise, for example, in the context of data rights disputes when a prime or subcontractor's trade secret was delivered to its government customer, and the defendant contractor later accused of misappropriating the alleged trade secret may cry, "It's government property." (In this scenario, the government may be a licensee with unlimited rights to the contractor's deliverable but usually does not own it or the underlying intellectual property.) Or, as demonstrated in a recent opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Advanced Fluid Systems Inc. (AFS) v. Huber et al.,1 a defendant may assert that the alleged trade secret

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from