Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2020

What 11th Circ. Guitar Ruling Means For Copyright Litigants

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

From the world of heavy metal rock-and-roll comes an important lesson for both putative copyright owners and accused infringers.

United StatesIntellectual Property

From the world of heavy metal rock-and-roll comes an important lesson for both putative copyright owners and accused infringers. If the accused infringer believes that the putative owner does not actually own the rights in the asserted copyright, it must speak up and repudiate ownership. Once that happens, the accuser must act within three years. If it doesn't, its claim is barred.

In a recent decision of first impression, the  U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit joined seven of its sister circuits in adopting the rule that copyright ownership claims accrue only once for purposes of the statute of limitations under the Copyright Act.1

Not only does this rule clarify the copyright statute of limitations in the Eleventh Circuit, but it further solidifies the growing and consistent body of law holding that copyright ownership claims accrue only once, even though copyright infringement claims accrue each time a new infringement occurs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from