Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 13 OCTOBER 2023

Update On Plausibility: Plausibility After G 2 / 21 (Video)

J A Kemp
J A Kemp
Contributor
J A Kemp

J A Kemp

J A Kemp is one of the largest European patent and trade mark attorney firms, with offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from J A Kemp

Almost six months have passed since the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its written decision in G 2/21 concerning plausibility in the context of inventive step.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Broadcast date: 10 October 2023 — Speakers: Ravi Srinivasan, Guy Brain

Almost six months have passed since the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal issued its written decision in G 2/21 concerning plausibility in the context of inventive step. The decision confirms that post-published data can in principle be used to support inventive step for a European application. However, the decision arguably raises more questions than it answers in defining when post-published data can be relied upon. In this webinar we will look at the decision in G 2/21, as well as how this might be applied by the EPO's Boards of Appeal and national courts. We will then consider best practice for European patent applications in light of this decision, and in particular whether any changes in approach are needed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from