Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2024

Undated Screenshot Insufficient To Prove Public Accessibility Of GitHub Repository

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The petitioner, AO Kaspersky Lab, argued that a whitepaper authored by Fratric ("Fratric") anticipated or rendered obvious all the claims of the ʼ591 patent.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In AO Kaspersky Lab v. Open Text Inc., the PTAB denied inter partes review after determining that a screenshot of a GitHub repository was insufficient to establish that a whitepaper posted to that repository qualified as a printed publication. IPR2023-00895, Paper 7 at 9 (Dec. 7, 2023) ("Decision"). This IPR involves U.S. Patent No. 10,284,591 ("the '591 patent"), directed to systems and methods that monitor, block, and report bugs or malware hidden in computer programs. Id.

The petitioner, AO Kaspersky Lab, argued that a whitepaper authored by Fratric ("Fratric") anticipated or rendered obvious all the claims of the ʼ591 patent. Decision at 2. The PTAB noted that "the petitioner bears the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that a particular document is a printed publication," and "[t]he key inquiry is whether or not a reference has been made publicly accessible." Decision at 8-9 (quoting Nobel Biocare Servs. AG v. Instradent USA, Inc., 903

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from