Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JULY 2022

TTABlog Test: Is "SUPERSALT" Merely Descriptive Of Dietary Supplements?

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark SUPERSALT for "dietary supplements," on the ground of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1).

United StatesIntellectual Property

The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark SUPERSALT for "dietary supplements," on the ground of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). The evidence established that salt is a common ingredient of supplements, and the Examining Attorney argued that "super" is merely laudatory and descriptive. Applicant contended that SUPERSALT is a unitary, suggestive mark whose structure and alliteration cause a consumer to pause and think about the goods. How do you think this came out?  In re Super Salt, LLC, Serial No. 88143498 (July 22, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. Goodman).

1216162a.JPG

The Board found the word "salt"to be descriptive of Applicant's electrolyte salt dietary supplements. The word "super" describes the main ingredient of applicant's product, pink sea salt, as being superior, first-rate, and high quality.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from