Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MARCH 2022

TTABlog Test: How Did These Four Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Well, we finally had a reversal, or at least a partial reversal, in a Section 2(d) appeal: see the TRITAN decision (here).

United StatesIntellectual Property
John L. Welch
John L. Welch
Author LinkedIn connections

Well, we finally had a reversal, or at least a partial reversal, in a Section 2(d) appeal: see the TRITAN decision (here). But the other 40 Section 2(d) appeals decided this year resulted in affirmances. Here are four more appeals decided this week. How do you think they turned out? Answer in first comment.

1171916.jpg

In re JSS Concepts Holding Co., LLC, Serial No. 88362890 (March 3, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw) [Section 2(d) refusal of HEIRLOOM HOSPITALITY for "Offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurants and bars; Outsource service provider in the field of business management of restaurants and bars" [HOSPITALITY disclaimed], in view of the registered mark HEIRLOOM for "Branding services, namely, consulting, development, management and marketing of brands for businesses and/or individuals."]

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

UMG v. DistroKid: When AI Becomes A Consumer Protection Issue

Universal Music Group's lawsuit against DistroKid raises a critical question about AI disclosure in consumer markets: when does the use of artificial intelligence become material information that must be disclosed to consumers? The case centers on allegations that DistroKid distributed mass-generated AI music while creating the impression it was created by legitimate human artists, potentially violating existing consumer protection laws even without specific AI disclosure requirements.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Article

The Trademark Scam Field Guide: Look-Alike Filing Sites, Fake USPTO Notices, And How To Get Out If You’ve Been Caught

A business decides to file a trademark. Someone on the team searches for a familiar online legal-services brand, clicks the first result, and lands on a site with a similar-sounding name, a polished design, five-star reviews, and a low flat fee. The application gets filed. Months later the business learns the “service” was not who they thought it was, the filing was signed by someone with no authority to sign it, and the USPTO has suspended the application along with hundreds or thousands of others from the same shop.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Harness IP
Harness IP
Article

PTAB/USPTO Update - October 2026

The USPTO has released new templates and guidance for AIA trial proceedings, announced key appointments including a Chief AI Officer, and published updated procedures for patent applications and subject matter eligibility declarations. Director Squires delivered multiple addresses emphasizing the constitutional importance of intellectual property rights while the agency expanded its community engagement efforts and international collaboration through WIPO's Global IP Assignment Platform pilot program.
United StatesIntellectual Property
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Article

U.S. Government Backs Fair Use For AI Training In OpenAI Copyright Litigation

The U.S. government has filed a Statement of Interest of the United States of America under 28 U.S.C. § 517 in the Southern District of New York multidistrict litigation over OpenAI’s use of copyrighted works to train large language models. The filing appears to be the federal government’s first direct intervention in the wave of artificial intelligence (AI) training copyright cases, and it advises the court to treat model training (separate from use of AI to generate outputs) on copyrighted text standing alone as a highly transformative fair use under current law.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Podcast

Episode 59: Running Interference: IP Issues In The Sports And Wellness Markets (Podcast)

The economic impact of sports and fitness markets continues to surge, with franchise valuations and technological innovation reaching unprecedented levels. From wearable devices to performance analytics, intellectual property has become a strategic weapon in an industry where companies compete as aggressively as the athletes themselves. Wolf Greenfield examines the patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and licensing issues shaping this rapidly evolving landscape.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks