Oakley, Inc. opposed an application to register the mark
FROGSKINS (standard characters) for
"protective cover and cases for cell phones, laptop computers,
tablet computers and portable media players," claiming a
likelihood of confusion with its identical mark registered for
"eyewear, namely sunglasses and accessories for sunglasses,
namely, replacement lenses, ear stems and nose pieces."
Because the marks are identical, a lesser degree of similarity
between the goods is necessary to support a finding of likely
confusion. But are the goods close enough? How do you think this
came out? Oakley, Inc. v. JMM Lee Properties, LLC,
Opposition No. 91231865 [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc
A. Bergsman).