Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2017

TTAB Test: Is FALL HARVEST Confusable With AUTUMN HARVEST BLEND For Coffee?

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

The USPTO refused registration of the mark FALL HARVEST for "coffee for use in single-serve brewing machines," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark AUTUMN HARVEST BLEND for...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The USPTO refused registration of the mark FALL HARVEST for "coffee for use in single-serve brewing machines," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark AUTUMN HARVEST BLEND for "whole roasted coffee beans, ground roasted coffee beans and processed ground coffee beans" [BLEND disclaimed]. Applicant pointed out that its goods would be used by consumers only for single-service machines, and it argued that in view of 14 third-party registrations, HARVEST is a weak formative. How do you think this came out? In re Trilliant Food and Nutrition, LLC, Serial No. 87400795 (December 11, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas).

The Board found that the involved goods overlap. Registrant's goods are broadly described and its coffee beans include ground roasted coffee beans "for use in single serve brewing machines." The evidence showed that fresh ground coffee can be used in a coffee maker instead of pods. Because the goods

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from