Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MARCH 2014

The Katten Kattwalk - Winter 2014

Katten
Katten
Contributor
Katten

Katten

With client service at our core and a collective desire to foster an inclusive environment for a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Katten

Courts have traditionally held that irreparable harm to a trademark owner was presumed if a defendant’s use of the mark is likely to cause confusion.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Edited by Karen Artz Ash

Trademark Infringed? No Preliminary Injunction Unless Irreparable Harm Proved

by Karen Artz Ash and Bret J. Danow

In deciding motions for preliminary injunction in a trademark infringement case, courts have traditionally held that irreparable harm to a trademark owner was presumed once a finding was made that a defendant's use of the mark at issue is likely to cause confusion. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, however, in the case Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management, Inc, recently broke away from past precedent and took a different approach to the standard for granting injunctive relief in a trademark infringement matter.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from