Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MAY 2007

Supreme Court Issues Groundbreaking Ruling Making It Easier To Invalidate Patents As Obvious

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

The Supreme Court issued a major new decision on patent law today, creating uncertainty about whether existing patents might be invalidated as too similar to previous inventions. Under the patent statute, an inventor cannot obtain a patent if the invention is "obvious" in light of prior work in the field.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Longstanding Federal Circuit "Teaching-Suggestion-Motivation" Test No Longer the Exclusive Way to Show Obviousness

The Supreme Court issued a major new decision on patent law today, creating uncertainty about whether existing patents might be invalidated as too similar to previous inventions. Under the patent statute, an inventor cannot obtain a patent if the invention is "obvious" in light of prior work in the field. The Supreme Court decision rejected a longstanding Federal Circuit test for demonstrating that a patent is obvious under that statute. In a decision issued on April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Circuit’s "teaching-suggestion-motivation" test conflicted with the patent statute and the Supreme Court’s precedents. As a result, businesses facing a patent infringement suit will have an easier time demonstrating that the Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") mistakenly issued a patent for an obvious invention. In addition, examiners in the PTO will likely

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from