Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2021

Some Conditions May Apply – Fintiv Factor 4 Analysis

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board granted institution of inter partes review after accepting the Petitioner Microsoft's stipulation to forego overlapping challenges...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board granted institution of inter partes review after accepting the Petitioner Microsoft's stipulation to forego overlapping challenges in parallel district court proceedings conditioned upon institution of IPR.  Microsoft Corp. v. D3D Tech., Inc., IPR2021-00647, Paper 10 (PTAB Sept. 1, 2021).  The Patent Owner D3D urged the PTAB to exercise its discretion to deny institution, but the Board found that Microsoft's conditional stipulation mitigated inefficiencies caused by an overlap of issues between the IPR proceeding and the district court proceeding.  Concluding that the Fintiv  factors weighed against a discretionary denial, the PTAB instituted IPR of D3D's patent.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from