Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2019

Should § 101 Legislation Include An Extension Or Revamp Of The CBM Program?

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The unabashed intent of the proposed legislation is to expand what is patentable under § 101, and a draft bill would expressly abrogate any case that has interprete

United StatesIntellectual Property

Is the little-used CBM patent review program the key to passage of § 101 legislation?

Congress is currently considering legislation to drastically alter the patent eligibility statute, 35 U.S.C. § 101.

The unabashed intent of the proposed legislation is to expand what is patentable under § 101, and a draft bill would expressly abrogate any case that has interpreted the "abstract idea" exception and the other judicially-created exceptions to patent-eligible subject matter.

Supporters believe a re-work of § 101 is critically necessary because the courts are interpreting the current statute too narrowly, resulting in greatly decreased research, development, and innovation in areas like medical diagnostics and artificial intelligence. Opponents argue, however, that expanding § 101 patent-eligible subject matter will result in a resurgence of weak patents and nuisance-value patent infringement suits.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from