Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 APRIL 2007

Recent Significant Patent Law Decisions

Intellectual property practitioners and owners are awaiting what could be a revolutionary decision from the United States Supreme Court in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc., a challenge to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals’ teaching-suggestion-motivation test for determining obviousness.

United StatesIntellectual Property

By David Elkins

Intellectual property practitioners and owners are awaiting what could be a revolutionary decision from the United States Supreme Court in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc., a challenge to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals’ teaching-suggestion-motivation test for determining obviousness. In the meantime, two recent patent decisions – while perhaps not as sweeping in scope – merit attention. One decision will affect past and future patent licensing. The other may rein in claims of inducing infringement and spark an independent reason to seek opinions of counsel as to noninfringement and/or invalidity.

Freedom to Challenge Existing Licenses?

Continuing its recent interest in reviewing important Federal Circuit patent decisions, the United States Supreme Court shook up the world of patent licensing with its January 9, 2007 decision in MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. __, 127 S. Ct. 764 (2007). The 8-1 decision, authored by Justice Scalia (Justice

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from