Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JANUARY 2025

PTAB Reiterates Strict Evidentiary Standard For Printed Publications

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The PTAB denied institution of inter partes review (IPR) for a patent directed to geothermal technology. Fervo Energy Co. v. Ormat Techs. Inc., IPR2014-00665, Paper 18 (PTAB Sept. 18, 2024).

United StatesIntellectual Property

The PTAB denied institution of inter partes review (IPR) for a patent directed to geothermal technology. Fervo Energy Co. v. Ormat Techs. Inc., IPR2014-00665, Paper 18 (PTAB Sept. 18, 2024). The claimed invention related to "enhancing the flow of geothermal fluid" via horizontal wells which "generate a water density difference and a pressure difference." Petitioner challenged all claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Because the record did not include publication dates for two references, the PTAB determined neither reference was available as prior art. This decision reinforces the strict evidentiary standard required to establish a printed publication as prior art in IPR proceedings.

For a printed publication to qualify as prior art in an IPR, a reference must be publicly available. The Federal Circuit recently described "publicly available" as "whether interested members of the relevant public could locate the reference by reasonable diligence." Weber Inc. v.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from