Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MAY 2017

PTAB Nixes Reliance On Technical Report: Not Publication

We have previously written about disputes regarding whether a prior art reference qualifies as a publication in AIA trials.

United StatesIntellectual Property

We have previously written about disputes regarding whether a prior art reference qualifies as a publication in AIA trials.1 In a recent decision, the Board ruled that a prior art reference did not qualify as a publication under §102(a). The case, Activision Blizzard v Acceleration Bay,2 rejected petitioner's attempt to rely on a 1999 technical report allegedly published by University of California / San Diego ("UCSD").

Key Takeaway:  This case demonstrates that the PTAB will adhere to demanding requirements for petitioners to establish that a reference qualifies as a prior art publication. Petitioners should be prepared to provide detailed evidence showing a prior art reference was publicly accessible before the priority date of a challenged patent. Meanwhile, patent owners should take advantage of opportunities to challenge the public accessibility of references, particularly where the evidence and arguments in a petition are conclusory; such challenges can be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from