Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JUNE 2017

PTAB Invalidates Two Cisco Patents Found Valid And Infringed At The ITC

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") issued Final Written Decisions regarding Cisco's U.S. Patent Nos. 6,377,577 ( the "'577 Patent") and 7,023,853 (the "'853 Patent") on May 25, 2017...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") issued Final Written Decisions regarding Cisco's U.S. Patent Nos. 6,377,577 ( the "'577 Patent") and 7,023,853 (the "'853 Patent") on May 25, 2017 and U.S. Patent No. 7,224,668 ( the "'668 Patent") on June 1, 2017. The PTAB found the '577 and '668 Patents invalid but upheld the validity of the '853 Patent. The Inter Partes Review ("IPR") proceedings were brought by Arista Networks in retaliation to Cisco's accusations of infringement brought in multiple venues, including at the U.S. International Trade Commission ("ITC"), which had just a few weeks earlier upheld the validity of these very same patents and determined that Arista infringed the '577 and '668 Patents, and issued exclusion and cease and desist orders accordingly. Since the IPR decisions issued Arista has filed a petition asking the ITC to suspend its limited exclusion order regarding the '577 Patent based on the PTAB's decision and is expected to file a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from