Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2017

PTAB Denies Timely, Relevant Supplement To Petition

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

By rule, a petitioner may request permission from the Board to submit supplemental information in an IPR proceeding if:

United StatesIntellectual Property

By rule, a petitioner may request permission from the Board to submit supplemental information in an IPR proceeding if: (1) the request is filed within one month of the Board's institution decision, and (2) the supplemental information is "relevant to a [patent] claim for which the trial has been instituted." 37 C.F.R. § 42.123(a). As the Board recently demonstrated, however, a petitioner's request for consideration of supplemental information may be denied even if both of these requirements are satisfied. The Board's decision underscores the critical importance of including in an IPR petition the entirety of an invalidity argument and any supporting evidence.

In IPR2017-00028, the petitioner moved—less than one month after institution—to submit certain supplemental information. IPR2017-00028, Paper 22 at 3 (June 13, 2017). Specifically, the petitioner sought to submit five additional exhibits, each related to a French book chapter. Id. at 2. The additional exhibits

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from