Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 APRIL 2019

Precedential No. 5: TTAB Finds VIRTUAL INDEPENDENT PARALEGALS Generic For ..... Guess What?

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

In a less than scintillating but precedential ruling, the Board affirmed two refusals to register VIRTUAL INDEPENDENT PARALEGALS for "paralegal services; providing medical record summaries,

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a less than scintillating but precedential ruling, the Board affirmed two refusals to register VIRTUAL INDEPENDENT PARALEGALS for "paralegal services; providing medical record summaries, deposition summaries and document review; litigation support services" [PARALEGALS disclaimed], finding the phrase to be "indisputably generic" for, or alternatively merely descriptive of, the identified services. The Board concluded that the applied-for mark "identifies a class of paralegals who telecommute or work remotely." As to the Section 2(e)(1) refusal, the Board deemed the phrase to be "highly descriptive" and rejected as insufficient the applicant' claim of acquired distinctiveness based solely on its declaration of five years of continuous and substantially exclusive use. In re Virtual Independent Paralegals, LLC, Serial No. 86947786 (March 27, 2019) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. Bergsman).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from