Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 FEBRUARY 2018

Precedential No. 2: TTAB Again Lets Party Off The Hook Based On January 2017 Rule Changes

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

On June 29, 2017, the day its pretrial disclosures were due, Opposer Kid-Systeme filed a motion to reopen its time to file a motion for summary judgment.

United StatesIntellectual Property

On June 29, 2017, the day its pretrial disclosures were due, Opposer Kid-Systeme filed a motion to reopen its time to file a motion for summary judgment. Trademark Rule 2.127(e)(1), as amended in January 2017, provides that a summary judgment motion must be filed "prior to the deadline for pretrial disclosures, as originally set or reset." The Board noted that "prior to" means the day before the deadline. Opposer missed the deadline. Would the Board reopen? Not to worry! Because opposer's motion was filed during the period of transition to the amended Rules, and because the Board clarified Rule 2.127(e)(1) in a July 21, 2017 notice issued after opposer's filing, the Board chose to consider the summary judgment motion and to treat the motion to reopen as moot. http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/ttabvue-91229946-OPP-13.pdfKID-Systeme GmbH v. Türk Hava Yollari Teknik Anonim Sirket, Opposition No. 91229946 (January 12, 2018) [precedential].

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from