Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 NOVEMBER 2019

Precedential Decisions Offer Guidance On Bars To Institution

An inter partes review may not be instituted if, before the date on which the petition is filed, the petitioner or real party in interest filed a civil action challenging the validity of a ...

United StatesIntellectual Property

An inter partes review may not be instituted if, before the date on which the petition is filed, the petitioner or real party in interest filed a civil action challenging the validity of a claim of the challenged patent. See 35 U.S.C. § 315(a). Likewise, an inter parties review may not be instituted if the petition requesting the proceeding is filed more than 1 year after the date on which the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy is served with a complaint alleging infringement of the challenged patent. See 35 U.S.C. § 315(b). Three decisions recently designated as precedential by the PTAB provide further guidance on such bars to institution.

In Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chrimar Systems, Inc., IPR2018-01511, Paper 11 (PTAB Jan. 31, 2019), the Petitioner had filed a civil action challenging the validity of a claim of the challenged patent before the date on which the Petition was filed. Id. at 2. The Petitioner argued that § 315(a)(1) did not bar institution of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from