Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 18 NOVEMBER 2014

Post-Grant Insights: Staying District Court Litigation

Ropes & Gray LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Contributor
Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray is one of the world’s most respected law firms, with offices in key business and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ropes & Gray LLP

As soon as a PTAB petition is filed, one ought to file a motion to stay the district court proceedings so that a client isn’t forced to fight battles on both fronts.

United StatesIntellectual Property

As soon as a PTAB petition is filed, one ought to file a motion to stay the district court proceedings so that a client isn't forced to fight battles on both fronts.

Most district courts will require that the PTAB proceeding be instituted before staying proceedings; however, there are some district courts including the Northern District of California that may actually stay the proceeding before institution and that can be a helpful vehicle for a client.

By staying a district court proceeding, it enables a client who filed the petition to have an expedited proceeding in front of the PTAB to challenge the validity of the asserted patents and, meanwhile, put on hold all the expenditures related to expert discovery at the district court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from