Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 14 NOVEMBER 2017

Pending Supreme Court PTAB Cases (Video)

Ropes & Gray LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Contributor
Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray is one of the world’s most respected law firms, with offices in key business and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ropes & Gray LLP

Scott McKeown, Ropes & Gray IP litigation partner and chair of the firm's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) group, discusses potential impacts of pending Supreme Court PTAB cases...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Scott McKeown, Ropes & Gray IP litigation partner and chair of the firm's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) group, discusses potential impacts of pending Supreme Court PTAB cases, Oil States and SAS Institute.


In Oil States, the question is whether or not the PTAB is constitutional, given it is a bench trial with administrative patent judges, as opposed to what happens in the district court, where the bench trial is an option and the jury trial is also an option. That option is not available at the PTAB. If the Court should decide that the PTAB, as an Article I court, cannot look at these patent disputes because these patent disputes are private rights that only a jury can weigh in on as an opinion in the district court, then presumably the PTAB could be shut down. On the other hand, what I think many are expecting is a more reasoned opinion from the Court, explaining where patents fall in the realm of public rights versus privates rights. And perhaps the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from