Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2015

Patent Term Adjustment In The Post-RCE Period

But, is this practice a reasonable interpretation of the statute, or an arbitrary, capricious abuse of discretion?

United StatesIntellectual Property

We know from Novartis v. Lee that a patent application does not earn "B delay" type Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) from the time an RCE is filed until a Notice of Allowance is issued, but an application still can earn PTA for "A delay" when the USPTO takes more than four months after the RCE is filed to act on the application. However, the USPTO has been charging "Applicant Delay" when the applicant files any paper between the RCE and the next Office Action or Notice of Allowance, even though no PTA statute or rule expressly governs the post-RCE period.

The Patent Term Adjustment Statute

The PTA statute at issue is 35 USC § 154(b)(2)(C), which provides for a deduction from any PTA award "equal to the period of time during which the applicant failed to engage in reasonable efforts to conclude prosecution of the application." The statute also expressly delegates to the USPTO the authority to "prescribe regulations establishing the circumstances that constitute a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from