Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 OCTOBER 2024

Patent Owners Beware: Expanded Jurisdiction Risks In Using Third-Party Platforms To Remove Infringing Listings

Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Contributor
Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright is a full-service law firm with more than 550 lawyers, serving clients across the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dickinson Wright PLLC

In May 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a pivotal decision in Snaprays (SnapPower) v. Light Defense Group (LDG) that reshaped how patent owners enforce their rights using third.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In May 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a pivotal decision in Snaprays (SnapPower) v. Light Defense Group (LDG) that reshaped how patent owners enforce their rights using third-party platforms like Amazon. The ruling reversed a district court's dismissal of a declaratory judgment suit, finding that a patent owner's use of Amazon's Patent Evaluation Express (APEX) program exposed the patent owner to personal jurisdiction in an unexpected state.

Amazon's APEX program offers an expedited process for resolving claims that third-party listings on its marketplace infringe on utility patents, allowing patent holders to remove infringing products quickly. However, the CAFC's decision significantly expands the scope of personal jurisdiction, holding that by participating in APEX or similar programs, patent owners may inadvertently subject themselves to lawsuits in states where they would otherwise lack minimum legal contacts. This

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from