Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2017

PARIS BEACH CLUB Trademark. Get It?

En route to Paris for the spring conference of the Pharmaceutical Trade Marks Group, I am contemplating trying to pay a visit to the PARIS BEACH CLUB.

United StatesIntellectual Property

En route to Paris for the spring conference of the Pharmaceutical Trade Marks Group, I am contemplating trying to pay a visit to the PARIS BEACH CLUB.  Paris Beach Club!  Get it?  It's a joke because, as everyone of course knows, Paris is land-locked and has no beach.

Or so goes the reasoning of one of my favorite Trademark Trial & Appeal Board cases, In re Sharky's Dry Goods Co., 23 U.S.P.Q.2d 1061 (1992).  This decision is a great find for applicants seeking to register marks containing a geographic reference to a place where their goods do not originate, provided they coined their marks with a sense of humor.

Under Section 2(e)(3) of the Lanham Act, a mark cannot be registered if it is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive. A mark is considered geographically deceptively misdescriptive if (1) the primary significance of the mark is a generally known geographic location; (2) the consuming public is likely to believe that the goods originate from the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from