Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2022

Not Crossing The Wire: Petitioner Merely "Expanded" On Previously Filed Arguments Rather Than Making "New" Arguments

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

In Everstar Merchandise Co. Ltd. v. Willis Electric Co. Ltd., No. 2021-1882, 2022 WL 1089909 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2022) (non-precedential), the Court of Appeals for the ...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Holding

In Everstar Merchandise Co. Ltd. v. Willis Electric Co. Ltd., No. 2021-1882, 2022 WL 1089909 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2022) (non-precedential), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("the Federal Circuit") vacated a Final Written Decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("the PTAB") in PGR2019-00056. The PTAB found that Everstar failed to show the challenged claims of Willis' patent were unpatentable as obvious. The Federal Circuit held that the PTAB abused its discretion when it refused to consider whether cost reduction would have motivated one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the asserted references, and vacated and remanded the PTAB's decision.

Background

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from