Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2026

Nominative Fair Use Doesn’t Stop Airbnb From Reclaiming Domain Name

When a domain registrant incorporates a world-famous trademark into their web address, claiming to describe a legitimate service may not provide legal protection. A Ninth Circuit ruling in Smith v. Airbnb demonstrates how courts evaluate cybersquatting claims under the ACPA, examining the boundaries of nominative fair use and the limits of safe harbor defenses when famous brands are embedded in domain names.

United StatesIntellectual Property

When an entrepreneur registers a domain name that incorporates a world-famous trademark, sometimes they claim they are simply describing a legitimate third-party service. But a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit serves as a firm reality check for digital marketers and domain registrants looking to ride the coattails of big brands.

In Smith v. Airbnb, Inc., the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an action brought by pro se plaintiff Alex Smith, who filed suit under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) to block Airbnb from reclaiming airbnbseo.com.

The appellate court’s decision offers a masterclass in the limits of nominative fair use, the strength of famous trademarks online, and why appending generic industry acronyms to a famous mark will almost never insulate a registrant from cybersquatting liability.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from