Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 AUGUST 2017

No Right To A Jury Trial For Attorney Fee Awards Under 35 U.S. Code § 285

Section 285 of the Patent Act provides: "The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party."

United StatesIntellectual Property

Section 285 of the Patent Act provides: "The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party."  But, does the Seventh Amendment require a jury trial to decide the facts forming the basis of an award of attorney's fees under § 285 of the Patent Act?  In AIA America v. Avid Radiopharma (Fed. Cir. 2017), the Federal Circuit has ruled that the factual basis for an attorney fee award need not be decided by a jury — affirming a $4 million fee award that followed a jury trial on the sole issue of whether the plaintiff (AIA) owned the asserted patents. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,455,169 and 7,538,258.

AIA America, Inc. appealed the district court's award of attorney's fees to the Federal Circuit and argued that, when an award of attorney's fees is based in part or in whole on a party's state of mind, intent, or culpability, only a jury may decide those issues. The Federal Circuit rejected the argument and ruled that AIA's right to a jury trial

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from