Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 NOVEMBER 2025

New USPTO Director Continues IPR Shake-Up

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contributor
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt is a multidisciplinary, integrated national professional services firm known for quality and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Earlier this year the acting director of the USPTO "Sh[oo]k Up IPR Practice with Expanded Discretionary Denials" even before the new USPTO director had been confirmed by the Senate.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Earlier this year the acting director of the USPTO "Sh[oo]k Up IPR Practice with Expanded Discretionary Denials" even before the new USPTO director had been confirmed by the Senate. Director John Squires has now been confirmed, and he has taken this "shake-up" to a whole new level.

Background and Prior Changes

To review, the IPR process was created by the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) as a faster, more cost-effective alternative to challenging patent validity in court. Often used by defendants in infringement cases, an IPR begins when a challenger files a petition with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), laying out arguments for why a patent claim should be invalidated.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from