Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2023

New Solutions, Old Problems: The Thaler Case And Why AI Creations Will Not Be Granted Copyright Protection Easily

Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
Explore more from Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)

In its recent ruling in the case of Thaler v. Perlmutter, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed that artwork generated solely by artificial intelligence...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Thanks to Marianna Riedo for collaborating on this article

In its recent ruling in the case of Thaler v. Perlmutter,1 the United States District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed that artwork generated solely by artificial intelligence (AI) does not qualify for protection under the Copyright Act.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's argument that copyright law's adaptability to emerging technologies encompasses AI authorship. Judge Beryl A. Howell reasoned that although copyright law is designed to evolve with the changing times and embrace novel forms of expression, the essential requirement of human authorship—particularly human creativity—remains an unchanged and fundamental aspect of copyrightability.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from