Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 FEBRUARY 2008

Narrow Claim Construction “Charged” By Specification And Prosecution History

In a case designated by the Court as nonprecedential, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a broad claim construction arrived at by the district court, noting that claim differentiation “cannot serve to give a patent scope beyond the invention it discloses.”

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a case designated by the Court as nonprecedential, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a broad claim construction arrived at by the district court, noting that claim differentiation "cannot serve to give a patent scope beyond the invention it discloses."  Black & Decker, Inc. v. Robert Bosch Tool Corp., Case Nos. 07-1243, -1244 (Fed. Cir., Jan.7, 2008) (Prost, J., non-precedential).

The patents-in-suit relate to a combination of a radio and a battery charger.  Bosch appealed from a jury verdict, challenging the district court's broad construction of the term "power conversion circuit."  Bosch contended that the proper construction should require a plurality of DC-to-DC converters that can convert an input DC voltage to a different output DC voltage, either higher or lower, in accordance with the multi-voltage battery charging function of the claim invention.  Black & Decker

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from