Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 FEBRUARY 2017

Moving From Everyday Dosing To Less Frequent Dosing Is Obvious

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

In a consolidated Hatch-Waxman patent infringement action, a district court judge in Delaware recently found claims directed to a treatment for multiple sclerosis invalid as obvious.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a consolidated Hatch-Waxman patent infringement action, a district court judge in Delaware recently found claims directed to a treatment for multiple sclerosis invalid as obvious.

Plaintiffs were the holders of a New Drug Application for the administration of 40 mg/ml glatiramer acetate (GA) three times per week to treat patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. They marketed their product under the brand name COPAXONE®. Plaintiffs filed suit alleging patent infringement after several defendants submitted Abbreviated New Drug Applications seeking approval to market generic versions of COPAXONE®. After conducting a seven-day bench trial, the court held that all of the asserted patent claims were invalid as obvious.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from