Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2016

Maximising Success In UDRP Complaints

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is designed to address cases of abusive domain name registration and use.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is designed to address cases of abusive domain name registration and use. Since 1999, approximately 88% of all cases decided at the two most frequently used UDRP arbitration forums–the World Intellectual Property Organisation and the National Arbitration Forum–have resulted in the transfer or cancellation of the domain name(s) at issue. Because so many cybersquatters operate in secrecy, domain name registrants often do not contest a UDRP complaint led against them. Accordingly, before filing a complaint, trademark owners must carefully analyse the facts of their case and ensure that they back up their assertions with sufficient evidence. In this article, Finnegan attorneys  Douglas A. Rettew and  Jonathan Uffleman provide an overview of common issues that trademark holders should consider when preparing a UDRP complaint.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from