Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MAY 2020

Lights Out For Solar Cell Follow-On Petition

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The PTAB denied institution of a follow on petition filed five months after an initial petition by the same petitioner, even though the two petitions were directed to different claims.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The PTAB denied institution of a follow on petition filed five months after an initial petition by the same petitioner, even though the two petitions were directed to different claims.1 The Board found no persuasive explanation for the delay. And, it was particularly perturbed because the delay precluded Board consolidation, thus a second proceeding would expend the Board's finite resources on redundant issues.

In IPR2020-00047, the second petition, the petitioners LONGi Green Energy Tech. Co. et al. challenged claims 1-11 and 15-16 of Patent No. 9,893,215 directed to a method of manufacture of a solar cell. Five months earlier, however, LONGi filed a first petition in IPR 2019-01072 directed at claims 12-14 of the same patent. The original petition was filed in response to a district court action2 and an ITC action3 which alleged infringement only of claims 12-14.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from