Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MAY 2026

Let's Talk "About". . . That Bird?

Axinn
Axinn
Contributor
Axinn

Axinn

Incisive. Inclusive. Invested. We’re Axinn. Experienced, tenacious, and always trial-ready, we are...

View firm profile
Explore more from Axinn

Much ink has been spilled over the meaning of “about” when used to characterize an amount or a range recited in a patent claim.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Much ink has been spilled over the meaning of “about” when used to characterize an amount or a range recited in a patent claim. Sometimes the patent explicitly defines “about,” sometimes “about” simply means “approximately,” sometimes the scope of “about” is clarified based on arguments made during prosecution to gain allowance, and sometimes a skilled artisan might recognize the scope of “about” based on some constellation of the foregoing and knowledge in the art. But sometimes the meaning of “about” is not certain based on the unique facts of the case, and the patent claim is indefinite. Earlier today, the Federal Circuit addressed this last scenario. 

In Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. v. Safe Foods Corp., No. 2024-2160 (May 4, 2026), the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court judgment finding the term “about” indefinite as used in the asserted poultry processing claims. The patent claims recited methods for treating poultry during processing with peracetic acid to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from