Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2013

Just What Is "Covered" Under A Covered Business Method Post-Grant Review?

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The Transitional Program for Post-Grant Review of Covered Business Methods has been underway since September 16, 2012, yet the number of CBMs filed to date has been underwhelming.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Transitional Program for Post-Grant Review of Covered Business Methods (CBM) has been underway since September 16, 2012, yet the number of CBMs filed to date has been underwhelming. So far, parties have filed only 25 petitions, of which 10 were filed by Liberty Mutual.

Why the reticence to utilize CBMs? Perhaps the name alone suggests limited scope, and potential petitioners believe that the program is limited only to patents examined in Class 705, the USPTO classification most commonly associated with business methods. The legislative history, the PTO regulations, and the filings to date, however, indicate that CBM jurisdiction may be broader than practitioners realize.

First, the AIA legislation itself does not limit CBM jurisdiction by class. Instead, an eligible CBM patent is defined in section 18 of the AIA (now implemented at 37 C.F.R. § 42.301(a)) as:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from