Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 DECEMBER 2010

IP Update, Vol. 13, No. 11, November 2010 - Part 2

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a 6-2-1 en banc ruling, held that 35 U.S.C. §145 imposes no special limitation on a patent applicant’s right to introduce new evidence in a civil action against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

United StatesIntellectual Property
  • CERT ALERT: Stanford v. Roche to Be Heard at the Supreme Court
  • En Banc Review of Double Patenting Denied
  • IPO and DOJ File Opposing Amicus Briefs in Myriad

Trademarks

  • Once Legitimately Registered, Domain Name Held for Ransom Costs Kidnapper $150k
  • Second Circuit Allows Ownership Challenge Against Incontestable Mark
  • "Satisfied Customer" Misrepresentation Sufficient to Support Lanham Act Claims
  • Paris Appeals Court Confirms eBay's Liability for Selling Counterfeit and Unauthorized LVMH Perfumes on Auction Website

CERT ALERT: Stanford v. Roche to Be Heard at the Supreme Court
Paul Devinsky

The U. S. Supreme Court has granted a certiorari petition filed by Stanford University in a case involving the issue of whether, under the Bayh-Dole Act, individual inventors or contractors retain intellectual property rights to inventions arising out of federal grants to universities and non-profits. Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Case

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from