Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2016

IP Newsflash - March 25, 2016

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

IP Newsflash - March 25, 2016

United StatesIntellectual Property

SUPREME COURT CASES

Sequenom Seeks Supreme Court Review of Diagnostic Claims Held Invalid Under § 101

On Monday, March 21, 2016, Sequenom, Inc. filed a petition for writ of certiorari in Sequenom, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., et al., No. 141139 (Fed. Cir. June 12, 2015). The question posed to the Supreme Court centers around the patentability of diagnostic claims applied to newlydiscovered natural phenomena.

The claimed work dates back to 1996, when two doctors discovered paternal cellfree fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood serum and plasma. With that discovery, the doctors developed a method of testing fetal DNA to determine, among other things, the risk of certain birth defects in a manner far less invasive than conventional techniques, which required DNA samples to be taken directly from the fetus or placenta. The doctors obtained U.S. Patent No. 6,258,540 covering the methods.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from