Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2025

Invalidity Defense Raised Prior To PTAB Challenge Cannot Skirt Estoppel

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

The Northern District of Iowa recently held that a defendant's motion for partial summary judgment of invalidity was barred after the PTAB issued final written decisions, regardless of when the motion was filed.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Northern District of Iowa recently held that a defendant's motion for partial summary judgment of invalidity was barred after the PTAB issued final written decisions, regardless of when the motion was filed. The defendant filed its motion before the final written decisions were issued, but the court rejected the defendant's argument that the timing of the motion insulated it from estoppel.

The case involved six patents, two of which were the subject of PGR petitions that the defendant filed while the district court litigation was ongoing. During claim construction, the defendant argued that certain claim terms were indefinite. The district court agreed with the defendant and found the terms indefinite as a matter of law. Based on the court's constructions, the defendant filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking a determination that some of the patents—including the patents subject to PGR—were invalid.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from