Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 MARCH 2026

INFORMATIVE: No Discretionary Denial Where Prior IPR Suggests Material Error By Office

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Acting Director ssued a decision declining to exercise discretionary denial in three related inter partes reviews (“IPRs”) filed by Padagis US LLC (“Padagis”): IPR2025-00464, IPR2025-00465...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Acting Director ssued a decision declining to exercise discretionary denial in three related inter partes reviews (“IPRs”) filed by Padagis US LLC (“Padagis”): IPR2025-00464, IPR2025-00465, and IPR2025-00466 (collectively, “the Padagis IPRs”). These IPRs challenge U.S. Patent Nos. 8,895,546; 11,241,414; and 11,793,786, respectively, each of which is assigned to Neurelis, Inc. (“Neurelis”). On January 9, 2026, current USPTO Director John Squires designated the decision as informative.

Neurelis filed a request for discretionary denial, arguing that the proceedings should be denied institution in light of an upcoming district court trial scheduled for February 9, 2026—a date well before the projected final written decision due date of September 17, 2026. The Acting Director acknowledged that this timing factor ordinarily weighs in favor of discretionary denial.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from