Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2017

Implications Of Recent Supreme Court Free Speech Decision

The decision was the culmination of Simon Shiao Tams' fight to obtain a federal trademark registration for "THE SLANTS" for use in connection with his rock band.

United StatesIntellectual Property

On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Matal v. Tam, declaring the Trademark Act's (commonly referred to as the "Lanham Act") "disparagement clause" unconstitutional as a violation of the free speech principles embodied in the First Amendment. If the case name doesn't ring a bell, the players involved might. The decision was the culmination of Simon Shiao Tams' fight to obtain a federal trademark registration for "THE SLANTS" for use in connection with his rock band. The term "Slants" can be used as a racially pejorative word for persons of Asian descent and was selected by the Asian-American band in an effort to "reclaim" the derogatory term. Tam's win at the Supreme Court, however, wasn't only a victory for his band. The Washington Redskins, who are also engaged in a protracted legal battle to maintain their trademark registrations despite challenge from a Native American group, hailed the decision a success. The Redskins' owner, Dan Snyder,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from