Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JUNE 2022

How ITC Is Addressing Its Importation Requirement

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

A distinguishing aspect of a U.S. International Trade Commission investigation under Section 337 from a district court action is the importation requirement — the accused product must have been imported, or sold for importation, into the U.S.

United StatesIntellectual Property

A distinguishing aspect of aU.S. International Trade Commissioninvestigation under Section 337 from a district court action is the importation requirement - the accused product must have been imported, or sold for importation, into the U.S.

Specifically, depending on the basis for the alleged violation, the statute requires either unfair acts "in the importation of articles ... into the United States, or in the sale of such articles"1 or the "importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation" of an article accused of infringing an intellectual property right.2 A well-pled complaint, accordingly, must "[d]escribe specific instances of alleged unlawful importations or sales."3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from