Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 AUGUST 2023

Generative AI Cannot Meet Authorship Requirement For Copyright Protection, District Court Rules

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

A recent decision by Judge Beryl Howell in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ("D.C. District Court") affirmed that human authorship is required for copyright registration.

United StatesIntellectual Property

A recent decision by Judge Beryl Howell in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ("D.C. District Court") affirmed that human authorship is required for copyright registration. In granting the United States Copyright Office's (USCO) motion for summary judgment, the court agreed with the USCO's denial of a copyright registration for a work created by generative artificial intelligence (AI) absent any human involvement. This is one of several recent decisions addressing whether copyright protection is available for works created by generative AI, and raises numerous legal and policy issues that will continue to be addressed by courts and other government bodies in the near future.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from