Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 AUGUST 2017

Fox v. Aereokiller: Another Nail In The Internet "Cable" Coffin

Back in 2014, the Supreme Court, in American Broadcasting Companies. v. Aereo, Inc. (Aereo I), shot down a service...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Back in 2014, the Supreme Court, in American Broadcasting Companies. v. Aereo, Inc.  (Aereo I), shot down a service designed (1) to offer its subscribers internet/mobile access to live network TV programming, (2) without first obtaining licenses, (3) by employing a Rube Goldberg technology that "rented" personal (mini) TV antennas to each viewer, (4) in an effort to dodge a judicial ruling that the service violated the copyright holders' exclusive right to transmit performances of their programming to the public.

Since then, Aereo—the startup whose streaming service was blocked by the Court—and others have made numerous attempts to tweak the details in ways that would enable an internet cable solution. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently handed down yet another ruling that suggests that it will be difficult indeed to find such a solution.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from