Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - October 2017

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Prost, J. Reversing-in-part and remanding for new trial on written description and enablement.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi (No. 2017-1480, 10/5/17) (Prost, Taranto, Hughes)

October 5, 2017 3:51 PM

Prost, J. Reversing-in-part and remanding for new trial on written description and enablement. Also affirming JMOL of non-obviousness and vacating injunction. "[T]he use of post-priority-date evidence to show that a patent does not disclose a representative number of species of a claimed genus is proper. It was this legal error for the district court to categorically preclude all of Appellants' post-priority-date evidence of [the accused product] and other antibodies. Accordingly, we reverse the district court's decision and remand for a new trial on written description." The Court also found a jury instruction regarding written description to be improper.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from