Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2023

Federal Circuit Holds Party Can Challenge PTAB Rulemaking

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

In Apple, Inc. v. Katherine K. Vidal, the Federal Circuit ruled that Apple and the other plaintiffs could continue their suit on a lone surviving challenge to the PTAB Director's rulemaking procedures...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In Apple, Inc. v. Katherine K. Vidal, the Federal Circuit ruled that Apple and the other plaintiffs could continue their suit on a lone surviving challenge to the PTAB Director's rulemaking procedures regarding institutional discretion. Apple Inc. v. Vidal, No.5:20-cv-06128-EJD, at 3 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2023).

The underlying suit began on August 31, 2020 when "Apple and three other companies filed suit in the Northern District of California, seeking to challenge the [PTAB's precedential decision] Fintiv instructions on three grounds under the APA: (1) that the Director acted contrary to the IPR provisions of the patent statute, see 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(C); (2) that the Fintiv instructions are arbitrary and capricious, see 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); and (3) that the Fintiv instructions were issued without compliance with the notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements of 5 U.S.C. § 553." Id. at 11.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from